跳至正文
返回文库全部文档

深度学习发现股票价格形成中的共同订单簿模式

文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Justin Sirignano et al.

总结

本研究使用US股票报价和成交的高频数据库,通过深度学习建模订单簿供需与后续价格变化之间的关系。研究根据价格和订单流历史数据预测价格变动方向,并评估模型在不同股票和时期的表现。模型使用多只股票的数据共同训练,而非针对每种资产分别训练。

作者报告称,模型在不同板块和时期的样本外准确率稳定,包括训练时未纳入的股票。在对比中,汇总模型优于针对单项资产的线性和非线性模型,这支持价格形成中存在共同模式,也表明汇集不同股票的数据具有价值。标准化处理以及按行业板块或最小报价单位分组训练数据,都没有提升报告的结果;增加过去的观测数据则有所改善。研究结果表明存在路径依赖,但文档没有给出具体准确率、样本日期或交易成本分析。因此,方向预测结果并不能证明计入执行成本后模型仍能产生盈利交易。

核心观点

  • 深度学习模型将订单簿供需与后续股票价格变化联系起来。
  • 汇集多只股票的数据,表现优于经过测试的单项资产线性和非线性模型。
  • 据报告,模型的预测准确率在不同股票和时期均保持稳定,包括训练样本之外的股票。
  • 更长的价格和订单流历史数据可改善预测,表明存在路径依赖。
  • 文档报告了方向预测结果,但没有证明计入交易成本后仍能盈利。

标签

全文
# Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from Deep Learning


# Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from Deep Learning









Using a large-scale Deep Learning approach applied to a high-frequency database containing billions of electronic market quotes and transactions for US equities, we uncover nonparametric evidence for the existence of a universal and stationary price formation mechanism relating the dynamics of supply and demand for a stock, as revealed through the order book, to subsequent variations in its market price. We assess the model by testing its out-of-sample predictions for the direction of price moves given the history of price and order flow, across a wide range of stocks and time periods. The universal price formation model is shown to exhibit a remarkably stable out-of-sample prediction accuracy across time, for a wide range of stocks from different sectors. Interestingly, these results also hold for stocks which are not part of the training sample, showing that the relations captured by the model are universal and not asset-specific. The universal model --- trained on data from all stocks --- outperforms, in terms of out-of-sample prediction accuracy, asset-specific linear and nonlinear models trained on time series of any given stock, showing that the universal nature of price formation weighs in favour of pooling together financial data from various stocks, rather than designing asset- or sector-specific models as commonly done. Standard data normalizations based on volatility, price level or average spread, or partitioning the training data into sectors or categories such as large/small tick stocks, do not improve training results. On the other hand, inclusion of price and order flow history over many past observations is shown to improve forecasting performance, showing evidence of path-dependence in price dynamics.

在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0

此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。