信息比率揭示动量中的漂移与自相关
文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Fernando F. Ferreira et al.
总结
本研究使用信息比率(平均收益相对于波动率)考察动量表现如何随投资组合回看期变化。研究推导了两种可能动量来源下的理论信息比率:正收益自相关和平均收益漂移。分析表明,较短的数月回看期对自相关更敏感,而接近一年的时期更可能反映漂移。
作者将这些理论规律与按平稳时期划分的历史数据进行比较。他们发现,在某些时期,自相关更为重要,尤其是在1975之前;而在许多较晚时期,漂移的解释力更强。将策略应用于一个多世纪的道琼斯工业平均指数数据后,作者还报告称,多年回看期中的信息比率振荡有所减弱,并将其建模为向平均增长率回归。这些发现描述的是历史关系和理论机制,并未证明某种回看期在未来市场中表现最佳,也未考虑实施成本。
核心观点
- 信息比率随回看期长度及动量形成机制而变化。
- 较短回看期可能捕捉收益自相关,接近一年的较长时期则可能反映平均收益漂移。
- 不同历史时期中,自相关和漂移的重要性各不相同。
- 长期道琼斯数据呈现减弱的信息比率振荡,作者将其建模为向平均增长率回归。
标签
全文
# Information ratio analysis of momentum strategies # Information ratio analysis of momentum strategies In the past 20 years, momentum or trend following strategies have become an established part of the investor toolbox. We introduce a new way of analyzing momentum strategies by looking at the information ratio (IR, average return divided by standard deviation). We calculate the theoretical IR of a momentum strategy, and show that if momentum is mainly due to the positive autocorrelation in returns, IR as a function of the portfolio formation period (look-back) is very different from momentum due to the drift (average return). The IR shows that for look-back periods of a few months, the investor is more likely to tap into autocorrelation. However, for look-back periods closer to 1 year, the investor is more likely to tap into the drift. We compare the historical data to the theoretical IR by constructing stationary periods. The empirical study finds that there are periods/regimes where the autocorrelation is more important than the drift in explaining the IR (particularly pre-1975) and others where the drift is more important (mostly after 1975). We conclude our study by applying our momentum strategy to 100 plus years of the Dow-Jones Industrial Average. We report damped oscillations on the IR for look-back periods of several years and model such oscilations as a reversal to the mean growth rate.
在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0
此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。