跳至正文
返回文库全部文档

衡量 Kalshi 事件合约的公开结算终局性

文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Maksym Nechepurenko

总结

本研究将事件合约结算视为一系列公开市场状态,而不是一个普遍适用的单一时间戳。研究利用 Kalshi 上登记的注册和跟踪窗口,区分市场成员资格、生命周期消息、终端端点和缺失观测。研究使用公开的 REST 和 WebSocket 数据来识别确切端点,并在可能时将判定时间与端点时间配对。

报告显示,端点覆盖范围很广,尤其是通过 REST 获取的数据;中间路径的覆盖范围则较有限,且因市场组别而异。论文还报告了两个队列从判定到端点的时长差异描述性统计。论文提醒,场所层面的公开记录无法证明成员何时收到现金;传输数据缺口限制了对完整路径或修订情况的判断,且时长比较并非因果分析。历史规则版本无法与当前结算计时器关联,这进一步限制了解释。

核心观点

  • 研究将结算建模为包含不同生命周期消息和端点状态的公开状态路径。
  • REST 和 WebSocket 记录为识别确切的公开端点提供了不同证据。
  • 论文报告了具有精确配对时间戳的子样本从判定到端点的时长。
  • 公开端点时间无法证明成员收到现金的时间,也无法提供完整的中间市场历史。
  • 队列时长差异仅为描述性结果,当前计时器也无法与历史规则版本关联。

标签

全文
# 2610.00165


# Outcome Determination and Settlement Finality on Kalshi: Public State Paths, Prospective Measurement, and Empirical Identification









Event-contract settlement is a state path rather than a universal timestamp. Using a registered seven-day enrollment and seven-day administrative follow-up on Kalshi, this paper distinguishes market-object membership, lifecycle messages, endpoint states, and observation gaps. The MVE layer contains 7,611,594 tickers created inside the registered half-open interval; the reconstructed ordinary stock contains 152,694 markets at risk at the enrollment boundary, 3,477,227 already terminal records, and 11,410 boundary-uncertain records. The follow-up identifies exact public endpoints for 7,357,576 MVE market objects: 7,237,993 through REST settlement time alone, 119,212 agreeing across WebSocket and REST, and 371 WebSocket-only; 254,018 lack an admissible exact endpoint. In the ordinary boundary cohort, 71,657 markets have an exact WebSocket endpoint and 81,037 do not. These are venue-level public-finality outcomes, not member-cash observations. Exact determination-to-endpoint pairs are available for 126,806 MVE and 70,979 ordinary tickers, with respective mean durations of 9.676 and 322.50 seconds and observed maxima of 15 and 7,133 seconds. The contrast is descriptive, not causal. Transport gaps preserve two exact endpoint clocks but prevent the same rows from proving complete intermediate paths or absence of revisions; current settlement timers cannot be bound to historical rule versions. Public endpoint completion is therefore extensive, especially on REST, while path completeness remains narrower and family-specific. The exact-key historical crosswalk records earlier interim observations without changing the final cohort or endpoint facts.

在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0

此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。