跳至正文
返回文库全部文档

衡量Solana启动平台数据管道的代币重合度

文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Arati Uday Kamat

总结

本研究探讨两个独立配置的数据采集器是否会在Solana的pump.fun启动平台上观察到相同代币。一条管道检测与协同早期买入钱包相关的群组;另一条记录交易者侧盘前拒绝过滤器的判定。作者比较了两个连续时间窗口内的代币集合,将拒绝记录限制在各群组窗口内,并应用四种时间戳规则。研究报告了计数、观测比例以及Jaccard和Dice重合度指标。

结果显示,两者重合度很低,但两个窗口的覆盖范围差异显著。在第二个窗口中,群组中的623个代币有5个也出现在1,742个被拒绝代币中。第一个窗口存在数据采集缺口,仅覆盖最后14.25小时;在完整集合之间有一个代币重合,但在覆盖时段内没有重合。覆盖时间太短,因此第一个比较无法提供有效信息。研究据此提醒,采集器配置会影响观测到的代币样本,并建议在报告跨采集器重合度时同时报告覆盖范围。其比较仅涉及这些管道和窗口,并不代表所有Solana数据采集器。

核心观点

  • 研究比较了群组检测器与盘前拒绝日志记录器生成的代币集合。
  • 两个观测窗口中的管道数据重合度都非常有限。
  • 数据采集缺口使第一个窗口内覆盖时段的比较过于有限,无法解读。
  • 采集器配置可能影响链上研究样本所纳入的代币。
  • 作者建议报告采集器覆盖范围和跨采集器重合度。

标签

全文
# Do Two On-Chain Observation Pipelines See the Same Tokens? Cross-Pipeline Coverage on the Solana pump.fun Launchpad


# Do Two On-Chain Observation Pipelines See the Same Tokens? Cross-Pipeline Coverage on the Solana pump.fun Launchpad









On-chain studies of memecoin launchpads usually rely on one data-collection pipeline, yet whether differently configured pipelines observe the same tokens is rarely measured. This paper compares the output mint sets of two separately configured pipelines from one research programme on the Solana pump.fun launchpad: a cohort-detection pipeline that flags coordinated early-buyer wallets, and a rejection-filtering pipeline that logs a trader-side observer's pre-trade filter decisions. Two consecutive, non-overlapping windows are analysed (v1: June 2026; v2: June-July 2026); in each, the rejection data are restricted to the interval spanned by the cohort detections under four timestamp rules. Only raw counts, observed proportions and Jaccard/Dice indices are reported. In v2, where the rejection stream covers the whole 17.5-day window, the cohort set contains 623 mints and the rejection set 1,742, with 5 overlapping mints (0.803% of cohort; 0.287% of rejection). In v1 a collection gap means the rejection stream covers only the final 14.25 hours (4.4%) of the 13.4-day cohort window; the 20,162 cohort and 53 rejection mints share 1 mint, and within the covered interval none, a count too small to be informative. Both windows show nearly disjoint outputs, agreeing in direction but not in magnitude. Collector configuration, not only market behaviour, therefore shapes which tokens an on-chain study observes, and the paper proposes reporting cross-collector overlap and collector coverage as a routine check. Data and a script that re-derives every number are openly available.

在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0

此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。