跳至正文
返回文库全部文档

可变年金领取设计中的税收、阶梯调整与现金基金

文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Jennifer Alonso-Garcia et al.

总结

本文研究附带最低保证领取利益的可变年金中,保单持有人的领取和退保选择。合同包含税收条款,以及可在合同期内提高利益基数的阶梯调整机制。作者通过求解反向动态规划,最大化合同现金流贴现后的风险中性价值,以此对保单持有人的选择建模。

分析还考虑混合型合同,其中的现金基金持有收益并按指定利率计息。论文报告称,现金基金和阶梯调整机制都可以提高保单持有人的估值;当税负足够高时,两者可能都需要具备,才能促进需求。阶梯调整机制通过改善下行保护,往往会抑制提前退保;现金基金则可能促使保单持有人将保证领取款项转入现金基金,从而减少主动领取。这些结论基于模型,其影响取决于合同条款、税收规则和有关保单持有人行为的假设。

核心观点

  • 该研究对附带最低保证领取利益的可变年金中的领取选择建模。
  • 反向动态规划从保单持有人的角度评估贴现现金流。
  • 阶梯调整机制可提高利益基数,往往会降低提前退保的意愿。
  • 合同现金基金可通过利率和税收处理改变领取选择。
  • 报告中的影响取决于所建模的合同和税收条件。

标签

全文
# Variable annuities: A closer look at ratchet guarantees, hybrid contract designs, and taxation


# Variable annuities: A closer look at ratchet guarantees, hybrid contract designs, and taxation









This paper investigates optimal withdrawal strategies and behavior of policyholders in a variable annuity (VA) contract with a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB) rider incorporating taxation and a ratchet mechanism for enhancing the benefit base during the life of the contract. Mathematically, this is accomplished by solving a backward dynamic programming problem associated with optimizing the discounted risk-neutral expectation of cash flows from the contract from the policyholder's perspective. Furthermore, inspired by traded VA contracts in the market, we consider hybrid products providing policyholders access to a cash fund which functions as an intermediate repository of earnings from the VA and earns interest at a contractually specified cash rate. We contribute to the literature by revealing several significant interactions among taxation, the cash fund, and the benefit base update mechanism. The policyholder's valuation of the contract increases when a cash fund is included in the contract or when the benefit base updates via a ratchet mechanism. When the tax rate is sufficiently high, including both features is necessary to stimulate demand for the contract. Furthermore, the ratchet mechanism tends to discourage early surrender as it provides enhanced downside market risk protection. Similarly, the cash fund discourages active withdrawals, with policyholders preferring to transfer the guaranteed withdrawal amount to the cash fund to leverage the cash fund rate and the varying taxation rules around interest earnings.

在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0

此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。