订单流与市场冲击的双事件模型
文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Damian Eduardo Taranto et al.
总结
本文比较了两种描述已执行订单如何影响价格的线性方法。瞬时冲击模型通过传播函数对过去的市价单方向加权;历史依赖冲击模型则将价格变化与观察到的订单方向和其预期值之间的差距联系起来,并将这种影响视为永久性的。作者认为,两种模型还都应考虑过去收益。
作者将引起价格变化的事件与价格保持不变的事件区分开,并将二者纳入双事件传播函数模型。这改善了对冲击的描述,尤其是对价格变动少但信息含量高的大跳动股票,并捕捉到早期收益与后续订单流之间超出预期的反相关。报告称,历史依赖模型相较瞬时模型的优势不大。摘录没有提供样本、校准细节或实际交易结果;其结论涉及解释拟合,而非已证明的策略盈利能力。
核心观点
- 瞬时冲击模型使用传播函数对过去的市价单方向加权。
- 历史依赖模型将价格变化与订单方向偏离其预期水平的程度联系起来。
- 区分价格变化事件和价格不变事件能改善冲击描述,尤其适用于大跳动股票。
- 双事件模型捕捉到了单事件模型遗漏的过去收益与后续订单流之间的反相关。
- 报告的历史依赖模型拟合优势较小,且不能证明交易盈利能力。
标签
全文
# Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices I. Propagators: Transient vs. History Dependent Impact # Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices I. Propagators: Transient vs. History Dependent Impact Market impact is a key concept in the study of financial markets and several models have been proposed in the literature so far. The Transient Impact Model (TIM) posits that the price at high frequency time scales is a linear combination of the signs of the past executed market orders, weighted by a so-called propagator function. An alternative description -- the History Dependent Impact Model (HDIM) -- assumes that the deviation between the realised order sign and its expected level impacts the price linearly and permanently. The two models, however, should be extended since prices are a priori influenced not only by the past order flow, but also by the past realisation of returns themselves. In this paper, we propose a two-event framework, where price-changing and non price-changing events are considered separately. Two-event propagator models provide a remarkable improvement of the description of the market impact, especially for large tick stocks, where the events of price changes are very rare and very informative. Specifically the extended approach captures the excess anti-correlation between past returns and subsequent order flow which is missing in one-event models. Our results document the superior performances of the HDIMs even though only in minor relative terms compared to TIMs. This is somewhat surprising, because HDIMs are well grounded theoretically, while TIMs are, strictly speaking, inconsistent.
在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0
此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。