用回归与机器学习重新审视泰勒规则
文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Alper Deniz Karakas
总结
本文通过线性回归和非线性机器学习模型估计联邦基金利率,重新审视泰勒规则。在线性方法中,普通最小二乘法估计通胀、通胀缺口和产出缺口的系数,截距代表均衡实际利率目标。论文指出,传统规则对产出缺口和单独通胀率赋予的系数过大。
非线性系统将通胀和产出缺口作为输入,将联邦基金利率作为输出,并通过梯度下降最小化估计利率与历史实际利率之间的差异。报告称,除与泡沫破裂相关的三次衰退期间外,非线性方法的拟合更好。摘要未提供样本日期、详细绩效指标或模型设计细节,因而难以评估其泛化能力。文中认为,回归具有理论参考价值,而非线性模型更适用于利率估计。
核心观点
- 本文比较线性泰勒规则回归与非线性机器学习模型。
- 回归模型估计通胀、通胀缺口和产出缺口的系数。
- 非线性模型将通胀和产出缺口映射为联邦基金利率。
- 论文称,非线性模型的历史拟合更好,但泡沫相关的三次衰退期间除外。
- 摘要未提供绩效指标,也未提供足够细节来评估泛化能力。
标签
全文
# Reevaluating the Taylor Rule with Machine Learning # Reevaluating the Taylor Rule with Machine Learning This paper aims to reevaluate the Taylor Rule, through a linear and a nonlinear method, such that its estimated federal funds rates match those actually previously implemented by the Federal Reserve Bank. In the linear method, this paper uses an OLS regression model to find more accurate coefficients within the same Taylor Rule equation in which the dependent variable is the federal funds rate, and the independent variables are the inflation rate, the inflation gap, and the output gap. The intercept in the OLS regression model would capture the constant equilibrium target real interest rate set at 2. The linear OLS method suggests that the Taylor Rule overestimates the output gap and standalone inflation rate's coefficients for the Taylor Rule. The coefficients this paper suggests are shown in equation (2). In the nonlinear method, this paper uses a machine learning system in which the two inputs are the inflation rate and the output gap and the output is the federal funds rate. This system utilizes gradient descent error minimization to create a model that minimizes the error between the estimated federal funds rate and the actual previously implemented federal funds rate. Since the machine learning system allows the model to capture the more realistic nonlinear relationship between the variables, it significantly increases the estimation accuracy as a result. The actual and estimated federal funds rates are almost identical besides three recessions caused by bubble bursts, which the paper addresses in the concluding remarks. Overall, the first method provides theoretical insight while the second suggests a model with improved applicability.
在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0
此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。