利用工资增长改革美联储前瞻指引
文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Sudiksha Joshi
总结
本研究评估工资增长和就业人口比能否改进美联储在埃文斯规则下基于经济状态的前瞻指引。研究指出,将失业率和通胀率用作政策阈值存在局限,包括潜在偏差和测量误差。分析采用时间序列方法校准替代阈值,并考察其他劳动力利用率指标与这些阈值的关系。
随后,研究在FRB/US模拟中施加冲击,并比较三种情景下八个宏观经济变量的变化路径。研究报告称,工资增长阈值会使联邦基金利率比现行埃文斯规则更早启动上调。文档未提供阈值数值、冲击设定或详细模拟结果,因此只作高层次比较,信息不足以评估校准过程或复现分析。
核心观点
- 研究考察了埃文斯规则中失业率和通胀率阈值的替代方案。
- 研究使用时间序列分析校准工资增长和就业人口比阈值。
- FRB/US模拟比较了三种政策情景下的宏观经济反应。
- 研究报告的模拟中,工资增长情景使联邦基金利率更早启动上调。
- 文档未提供详细的校准或模拟设定。
标签
全文
# Reforming the State-Based Forward Guidance through Wage Growth Rate Threshold: Evidence from FRB/US Simulations # Reforming the State-Based Forward Guidance through Wage Growth Rate Threshold: Evidence from FRB/US Simulations I have analyzed the practicality of the Evans Rule in the state based forward guidance and possible ways to reform it. I examined the biases, measurement errors, and other limitations extant in the unemployment and the inflation rate in the Evans Rule. Using time series analysis, I calibrated the thresholds of ECI wage growth and the employment to population ratio and investigated the relationship between other labor utilization variables. Then I imposed various shocks and constructed impulse response functions to contrast the paths of eight macroeconomic variables under three scenarios. The results suggest that under the wage growth rate scenario, the federal funds rate lift off earlier than under the current Evans Rule.
在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0
此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。