PCA instrumentée pour les bêtas conditionnels et les prévisions de facteurs
Résumé
Ce notebook utilise un panel synthétique d’actifs pour présenter la PCA instrumentée PCA, où les expositions factorielles dépendent linéairement de caractéristiques observées avant les rendements. Les moindres carrés alternés estiment la relation entre caractéristiques et expositions, ainsi que les facteurs réalisés. Comme la représentation factorielle peut pivoter ou changer de signe sans modifier les rendements ajustés, la récupération est évaluée au moyen de diagnostics de sous-espace invariants par rotation, plutôt que par comparaison directe des étiquettes de facteurs.
Le notebook relie ensuite la structure ajustée à un processus de prévision en trois étapes : estimer les charges et l’historique des facteurs, prévoir les primes factorielles en n’utilisant que les informations disponibles à chaque décision, puis associer ces prévisions aux actifs au moyen des caractéristiques actuelles et de la relation fixe entre caractéristiques et charges. Dans la simulation, les caractéristiques d’une période sont associées aux rendements de la période suivante, avec une période d’embargo à la frontière de l’entraînement. Les prévisions walk-forward sont révélées séquentiellement ; l’incertitude et la sensibilité au nombre de facteurs supposé sont également présentées.
L’expérience retrouve la structure intégrée aux données, mais montre que les prévisions factorielles ne surpassent pas une référence à rendement nul lorsque les primes factorielles sont indépendantes. Il s’agit d’une simulation pédagogique, et non d’une évaluation finale intacte ni d’une preuve que les facteurs des marchés réels sont prévisibles. Les conclusions dépendent du processus générateur de données synthétiques.
Idées clés
- La PCA instrumentée PCA modélise les expositions des actifs comme des fonctions linéaires de caractéristiques observées avant les rendements.
- Les moindres carrés alternés estiment tour à tour la relation entre caractéristiques et charges et l’historique des facteurs.
- Comme les étiquettes factorielles peuvent pivoter ou changer de signe, comparez les sous-espaces récupérés à l’aide de diagnostics invariants par rotation.
- Une évaluation walk-forward valide prévoit chaque facteur avant d’en révéler la réalisation, puis associe les prévisions aux actifs à partir des caractéristiques actuelles.
- Retrouver une structure latente ne signifie pas que les primes factorielles futures peuvent être prévues avec précision.
Étiquettes
Texte intégral
# 04_ipca.py
```py
# ---
# jupyter:
# jupytext:
# cell_metadata_filter: tags,-all
# text_representation:
# extension: .py
# format_name: percent
# format_version: '1.3'
# jupytext_version: 1.19.3
# kernelspec:
# display_name: Python 3 (ipykernel)
# language: python
# name: python3
# ---
# %% [markdown]
# # Instrumented PCA: Conditional Betas and Factor Forecasts
#
# **Docker image**: `ml4t`
#
# **Chapter 14: Latent Factor Models**
#
# Instrumented PCA (IPCA) makes an asset's factor loadings linear functions of
# characteristics observed before the return:
#
# $$r^e_{i,t+1}=z_{i,t}^{\top}\Gamma f_{t+1}+\varepsilon_{i,t+1}.$$
#
# This notebook uses a synthetic panel with known $\Gamma$ for two separate
# checks. First, it verifies that alternating least squares (ALS) recovers the
# loading *subspace*. Second, it passes the estimated factors through the
# chapter's three-stage forecasting adapter without assuming that the factors
# are predictable.
#
# **Learning objectives**
#
# - implement the two ALS updates for IPCA;
# - evaluate recovery with rotation-invariant subspace diagnostics;
# - map genuinely walk-forward factor forecasts back to asset returns; and
# - report forecast uncertainty and sensitivity to the factor count.
#
# **Evaluation contract**: the synthetic characteristics at $t$ generate only
# $r_{t+1}$. The structural model uses 349 training pairs, followed by a
# one-period embargo and 150 evaluation pairs. The evaluation window is a
# teaching demonstration: it is neither a holdout kept untouched for a final
# measurement nor a set used to choose between models.
#
# **Prerequisite**: [`01_pca_equity_sectors`](01_pca_equity_sectors.ipynb)
#
# **Book section**: Section 14.5, "Bridging economics and statistics with advanced models"
#
# **Next**: [`05_rp_pca`](05_rp_pca.ipynb) changes the Stage 1 objective to
# emphasize priced variation.
# %% [markdown]
# ## 1. Setup
# %%
"""Recover an IPCA loading subspace and evaluate walk-forward factor forecasts."""
from datetime import datetime
from time import perf_counter
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import polars as pl
from matplotlib.colors import LinearSegmentedColormap
from matplotlib.patches import FancyBboxPatch
from ml4t.diagnostic.metrics import cross_sectional_ic_series
from ml4t.diagnostic.metrics.uncertainty import compute_ic_uncertainty
from scipy.linalg import orthogonal_procrustes
from utils.reproducibility import set_global_seeds
from utils.style import (
COLORS,
FIGSIZE,
add_message_title,
ml4t_diverging,
ml4t_palette,
show_with_alt,
zero_line,
)
# %% tags=["parameters"]
N_PERIODS = 500
N_ASSETS = 100
N_CHARACTERISTICS = 10
N_TRUE_FACTORS = 3
N_IPCA_FACTORS = 3
TRAIN_BOUNDARY = 350
EMBARGO = 1
MAX_ITER = 100
N_BOOTSTRAP = 2_000
EWMA_HALF_LIFE = 12
SEED = 42
set_global_seeds(SEED)
# %% [markdown]
# The adapter keeps three responsibilities separate. IPCA estimates the
# conditional loadings and realized factor history in Stage 1. Stage 2 uses
# only factor realizations available at each decision. Stage 3 combines the
# current characteristics with the fixed, train-only loading map.
# %%
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=FIGSIZE["single_wide"])
ax.set_xlim(0, 12)
ax.set_ylim(0, 4)
ax.axis("off")
boxes = [
(0.4, "Stage 1", "Fit Γ and realized\nfactor history", COLORS["silver_muted"]),
(4.4, "Stage 2", "Forecast next\nfactor premium", COLORS["amber_light"]),
(8.4, "Stage 3", "Map through\ncurrent betas", COLORS["silver"]),
]
for x_pos, stage, detail, facecolor in boxes:
patch = FancyBboxPatch(
(x_pos, 0.9),
3.2,
1.7,
boxstyle="round,pad=0.08",
facecolor=facecolor,
edgecolor=COLORS["blue"],
linewidth=1.2,
)
ax.add_patch(patch)
ax.text(x_pos + 1.6, 1.95, stage, ha="center", weight="semibold", color=COLORS["blue"])
ax.text(x_pos + 1.6, 1.42, detail, ha="center", fontsize=8.5, color=COLORS["neutral"])
for x_pos in (3.75, 7.75):
ax.annotate(
"",
xy=(x_pos + 0.55, 1.75),
xytext=(x_pos, 1.75),
arrowprops={"arrowstyle": "->", "color": COLORS["amber"], "lw": 1.5},
)
add_message_title(ax, "The three stages of a conditional factor model")
show_with_alt(
fig,
"A schematic of three labelled boxes left to right joined by arrows. Stage 1 fits "
"the loading matrix and the realized factor history; Stage 2 forecasts the next "
"factor premium; Stage 3 maps that forecast back to assets through the current "
"betas. The middle box is highlighted.",
)
# %% [markdown]
# ## 2. Alternating least squares
#
# For fixed $\Gamma$, each date is a small cross-sectional least-squares
# problem for $f_{t+1}$. A small ridge term protects the solve when the
# conditional beta matrix is nearly singular.
# %%
def estimate_factor_history(
returns: np.ndarray,
characteristics: np.ndarray,
gamma: np.ndarray,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Estimate one realized factor vector per return cross-section."""
n_periods = returns.shape[0]
n_factors = gamma.shape[1]
factors = np.empty((n_periods, n_factors))
ridge = 1e-8 * np.eye(n_factors)
for period in range(n_periods):
betas = characteristics[period] @ gamma
factors[period] = np.linalg.solve(
betas.T @ betas + ridge,
betas.T @ returns[period],
)
return factors
# %% [markdown]
# For fixed factors, stack the characteristic-factor interactions into one
# pooled regression. The coefficient vector reshapes directly into $\Gamma$.
# %%
def update_gamma(
returns: np.ndarray,
characteristics: np.ndarray,
factors: np.ndarray,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Update the characteristic loading map in one pooled regression."""
n_characteristics = characteristics.shape[2]
n_factors = factors.shape[1]
gram = np.zeros((n_characteristics * n_factors,) * 2)
score = np.zeros(n_characteristics * n_factors)
for period, factor in enumerate(factors):
design = np.einsum("nl,k->nlk", characteristics[period], factor).reshape(
returns.shape[1], -1
)
gram += design.T @ design
score += design.T @ returns[period]
ridge = 1e-8 * np.eye(gram.shape[0])
return np.linalg.solve(gram + ridge, score).reshape(n_characteristics, n_factors)
# %% [markdown]
# IPCA is unchanged by invertible rotations of $\Gamma$ and the factors.
# Orthonormalizing the loading map and ordering directions by factor variance
# chooses a stable representation without changing fitted returns.
# %%
def normalize_ipca(
gamma: np.ndarray,
factors: np.ndarray,
) -> tuple[np.ndarray, np.ndarray]:
"""Choose an orthonormal, variance-ordered representation."""
gamma_orthogonal, transform = np.linalg.qr(gamma)
factor_history = factors @ transform.T
covariance = np.atleast_2d(np.cov(factor_history, rowvar=False))
eigenvalues, rotation = np.linalg.eigh(covariance)
rotation = rotation[:, np.argsort(eigenvalues)[::-1]]
gamma_normalized = gamma_orthogonal @ rotation
factors_normalized = factor_history @ rotation
anchors = np.argmax(np.abs(gamma_normalized), axis=0)
signs = np.sign(gamma_normalized[anchors, np.arange(gamma.shape[1])])
signs[signs == 0] = 1
return gamma_normalized * signs, factors_normalized * signs
# %% [markdown]
# The initializer applies PCA to characteristic-managed returns. ALS then
# alternates the two closed-form updates until both objects stabilize.
# %%
def fit_ipca(
returns: np.ndarray,
characteristics: np.ndarray,
n_factors: int,
max_iter: int = 100,
tolerance: float = 1e-6,
) -> dict[str, object]:
"""Fit IPCA by alternating least squares."""
managed = np.einsum("tnl,tn->tl", characteristics, returns) / returns.shape[1]
eigenvalues, eigenvectors = np.linalg.eigh(managed.T @ managed)
gamma = eigenvectors[:, np.argsort(eigenvalues)[-n_factors:]]
previous_factors = np.zeros((returns.shape[0], n_factors))
converged = False
for iteration in range(1, max_iter + 1):
factors = estimate_factor_history(returns, characteristics, gamma)
updated_gamma = update_gamma(returns, characteristics, factors)
gamma_delta = np.max(np.abs(updated_gamma - gamma))
factor_delta = np.max(np.abs(factors - previous_factors))
gamma, previous_factors = updated_gamma, factors
if max(gamma_delta, factor_delta) < tolerance:
converged = True
break
factors = estimate_factor_history(returns, characteristics, gamma)
gamma, factors = normalize_ipca(gamma, factors)
fitted = np.einsum("tnk,tk->tn", characteristics @ gamma, factors)
return {
"gamma": gamma,
"factors": factors,
"converged": converged,
"iterations": iteration,
"mse": float(np.mean((returns - fitted) ** 2)),
}
# %% [markdown]
# ## 3. A timing-correct synthetic panel
#
# Characteristics follow persistent AR(1) processes and are standardized
# within each cross-section. The return paired with $z_t$ is generated from
# the independent factor shock at $t+1$, exactly matching the model equation.
# %%
def generate_ipca_panel(seed: int = SEED) -> dict[str, np.ndarray]:
"""Generate lagged characteristics and their next-period returns."""
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
characteristics = np.empty((N_PERIODS, N_ASSETS, N_CHARACTERISTICS))
characteristics[0] = rng.normal(size=(N_ASSETS, N_CHARACTERISTICS))
for period in range(1, N_PERIODS):
innovation = rng.normal(size=(N_ASSETS, N_CHARACTERISTICS))
characteristics[period] = 0.8 * characteristics[period - 1] + 0.6 * innovation
means = characteristics.mean(axis=1, keepdims=True)
scales = characteristics.std(axis=1, keepdims=True)
characteristics = (characteristics - means) / scales
true_gamma, _ = np.linalg.qr(rng.normal(size=(N_CHARACTERISTICS, N_TRUE_FACTORS)))
factor_scales = np.array([0.040, 0.025, 0.015])
true_factors = rng.normal(size=(N_PERIODS + 1, N_TRUE_FACTORS)) * factor_scales
betas = characteristics @ true_gamma
next_returns = np.einsum("tnk,tk->tn", betas, true_factors[1:])
next_returns += rng.normal(scale=0.010, size=next_returns.shape)
return {
"characteristics": characteristics,
"next_returns": next_returns,
"true_gamma": true_gamma,
"true_factors": true_factors,
}
# %%
panel = generate_ipca_panel()
train_stop = TRAIN_BOUNDARY - EMBARGO
test_start = TRAIN_BOUNDARY
train_characteristics = panel["characteristics"][:train_stop]
train_returns = panel["next_returns"][:train_stop]
embargo_characteristics = panel["characteristics"][train_stop:test_start]
embargo_returns = panel["next_returns"][train_stop:test_start]
test_characteristics = panel["characteristics"][test_start:]
test_returns = panel["next_returns"][test_start:]
print(
f"Pairs: train={len(train_returns)}, embargo={len(embargo_returns)}, "
f"evaluation={len(test_returns)}"
)
# %% [markdown]
# ## 4. Stage 1: recover the loading subspace
#
# Individual columns of $\Gamma$ are not identified: rotations and sign flips
# leave fitted returns unchanged. Principal-angle cosines and the distance
# between projection matrices therefore test the estimable object.
# %%
started = perf_counter()
ipca = fit_ipca(
train_returns,
train_characteristics,
n_factors=N_IPCA_FACTORS,
max_iter=MAX_ITER,
)
elapsed = perf_counter() - started
print(
f"ALS: converged={ipca['converged']}, iterations={ipca['iterations']}, "
f"train MSE={ipca['mse']:.6f}, elapsed={elapsed:.2f}s"
)
# %%
true_basis, _ = np.linalg.qr(panel["true_gamma"])
estimated_basis, _ = np.linalg.qr(ipca["gamma"])
principal_cosines = np.linalg.svd(true_basis.T @ estimated_basis, compute_uv=False)
projector_distance = np.linalg.norm(
true_basis @ true_basis.T - estimated_basis @ estimated_basis.T,
ord="fro",
)
alignment, _ = orthogonal_procrustes(estimated_basis, true_basis)
aligned_basis = estimated_basis @ alignment
alignment_rmse = float(np.sqrt(np.mean((true_basis - aligned_basis) ** 2)))
print(
"Subspace: cosines="
f"{np.round(principal_cosines, 4).tolist()}, "
f"projector distance={projector_distance:.4f}, aligned RMSE={alignment_rmse:.4f}"
)
# %% [markdown]
# Both panels below use the same color scale. Similar vertical patterns after
# orthogonal alignment indicate recovery of the loading subspace, not recovery
# of arbitrarily labeled columns.
# %%
gamma_cmap = LinearSegmentedColormap.from_list("ml4t_diverging", ml4t_diverging())
limit = float(np.max(np.abs(np.concatenate([true_basis, aligned_basis], axis=1))))
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=FIGSIZE["dual_h_tall"], sharey=True)
for ax, basis, label in zip(
axes,
(true_basis, aligned_basis),
("Known basis", "Estimated basis after alignment"),
strict=True,
):
image = ax.imshow(basis, aspect="auto", cmap=gamma_cmap, vmin=-limit, vmax=limit)
ax.set_xlabel(f"{label}\nLatent direction")
ax.set_xticks(range(N_TRUE_FACTORS), [f"F{k + 1}" for k in range(N_TRUE_FACTORS)])
axes[0].set_ylabel("Characteristic index")
fig.colorbar(image, ax=axes, label="Orthonormal loading coefficient", shrink=0.82)
add_message_title(
axes[0],
"Known and estimated loading matrices, side by side",
subtitle="Both shown after aligning the estimate to the known basis",
)
show_with_alt(
fig,
"Two heatmaps side by side on one colour scale, characteristic index on the vertical "
"axis and latent direction on the horizontal. The left is the known loading matrix "
"the data was generated from; the right is the estimate after alignment. A shared "
"colour bar gives the orthonormal loading coefficient.",
)
print(f"Minimum principal-angle cosine between the two subspaces: {principal_cosines.min():.3f}")
# %% [markdown]
# ## 5. Stage 2: one-step factor forecasts
#
# Each forecast is computed before the matching evaluation factor is appended
# to history. The embargo-period return is observable at the first evaluation
# decision, so it updates the factor history but never enters the Stage 1 fit.
# %%
def constant_factor_forecast(history: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""Forecast each factor with its expanding historical mean."""
return history.mean(axis=0)
# %%
def ar1_factor_forecast(history: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""Fit one AR(1) per factor and forecast from the latest realization."""
forecasts = np.empty(history.shape[1])
design = np.column_stack([np.ones(len(history) - 1), history[:-1]])
for factor in range(history.shape[1]):
coefficients = np.linalg.lstsq(design[:, [0, factor + 1]], history[1:, factor], rcond=None)[
0
]
forecasts[factor] = coefficients[0] + coefficients[1] * history[-1, factor]
return forecasts
# %%
def ewma_factor_forecast(
history: np.ndarray,
half_life: int = EWMA_HALF_LIFE,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Forecast with an exponentially weighted mean of available factors."""
ages = np.arange(len(history) - 1, -1, -1)
weights = np.exp(-np.log(2) * ages / half_life)
weights /= weights.sum()
return weights @ history
# %%
def walk_forward_factor_forecasts(
initial_history: np.ndarray,
realized_factors: np.ndarray,
) -> dict[str, np.ndarray]:
"""Forecast first, then reveal and append each realized factor vector."""
forecasters = {
"Expanding mean": constant_factor_forecast,
"AR(1)": ar1_factor_forecast,
"EWMA": ewma_factor_forecast,
}
predictions = {name: np.empty_like(realized_factors) for name in forecasters}
history = initial_history.copy()
for step, realized in enumerate(realized_factors):
for name, forecaster in forecasters.items():
predictions[name][step] = forecaster(history)
history = np.vstack([history, realized])
return predictions
# %%
embargo_factors = estimate_factor_history(
embargo_returns,
embargo_characteristics,
ipca["gamma"],
)
initial_factor_history = np.vstack([ipca["factors"], embargo_factors])
realized_test_factors = estimate_factor_history(
test_returns,
test_characteristics,
ipca["gamma"],
)
factor_forecasts = walk_forward_factor_forecasts(
initial_factor_history,
realized_test_factors,
)
# %% [markdown]
# ## 6. Stage 3: asset forecasts and uncertainty
#
# The mapper uses only current characteristics and the train-only $\Gamma$.
# Forecast $R^2$ uses the economically neutral zero-return forecast as its
# denominator. Cross-sectional IC uncertainty uses a Newey-West standard error;
# the displayed interval is not an independence-based shortcut.
# %%
def map_asset_forecasts(
characteristics: np.ndarray,
gamma: np.ndarray,
factor_forecasts: np.ndarray,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Map factor forecasts through current conditional betas."""
return np.einsum("tnk,tk->tn", characteristics @ gamma, factor_forecasts)
# %%
def as_long_panel(values: np.ndarray, value_name: str) -> pl.DataFrame:
"""Convert a period-by-asset matrix to the canonical long schema."""
timestamps = pl.datetime_range(
datetime(2000, 1, 1),
datetime(2000, 1, 1) + pl.duration(days=values.shape[0] - 1),
interval="1d",
eager=True,
)
return pl.DataFrame(
{
"timestamp": np.repeat(timestamps.to_numpy(), values.shape[1]),
"symbol": np.tile([f"A{i:03d}" for i in range(values.shape[1])], values.shape[0]),
value_name: values.ravel(),
}
)
# %%
def evaluate_asset_forecast(
name: str,
predictions: np.ndarray,
realized_returns: np.ndarray,
seed: int,
) -> dict[str, float | str]:
"""Compute zero-benchmark error and HAC IC uncertainty."""
pred_frame = as_long_panel(predictions, "prediction")
return_frame = as_long_panel(realized_returns, "forward_return")
ic_frame = cross_sectional_ic_series(
pred_frame,
return_frame,
date_col="timestamp",
entity_col="symbol",
)
uncertainty = compute_ic_uncertainty(
ic_frame,
horizon=1,
n_boot=N_BOOTSTRAP,
seed=seed,
)
mse = float(np.mean((realized_returns - predictions) ** 2))
zero_mse = float(np.mean(realized_returns**2))
return {
"name": name,
"mse_ratio": mse / zero_mse,
"r2_zero": 1 - mse / zero_mse,
"mean_ic": uncertainty["mean_ic"],
"ci_low": uncertainty["ci_hac_lower"],
"ci_high": uncertainty["ci_hac_upper"],
"p_hac": uncertainty["p_hac"],
}
# %%
forecast_results = []
for index, (name, forecast) in enumerate(factor_forecasts.items()):
asset_predictions = map_asset_forecasts(
test_characteristics,
ipca["gamma"],
forecast,
)
result = evaluate_asset_forecast(name, asset_predictions, test_returns, SEED + index)
forecast_results.append(result)
print(
f"{name}: MSE ratio={result['mse_ratio']:.4f}, "
f"IC={result['mean_ic']:.4f} "
f"[{result['ci_low']:.4f}, {result['ci_high']:.4f}], "
f"HAC p={result['p_hac']:.3f}"
)
# %% [markdown]
# The zero-return benchmark is deliberately hard to beat when latent premia
# are independent draws with mean zero. The IC intervals show whether any
# apparent cross-sectional ordering is larger than the time-series uncertainty
# around it.
# %%
names = [result["name"] for result in forecast_results]
ratios = np.array([result["mse_ratio"] for result in forecast_results])
means = np.array([result["mean_ic"] for result in forecast_results])
lower = np.array([result["ci_low"] for result in forecast_results])
upper = np.array([result["ci_high"] for result in forecast_results])
colors = ml4t_palette(len(names), categorical=True)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=FIGSIZE["dual_v"], sharex=True, constrained_layout=True)
axes[0].bar(names, ratios, color=colors)
zero_line(axes[0], at=1.0)
axes[0].set_ylabel("MSE ratio vs zero")
add_message_title(axes[0], "Test MSE relative to the zero-return forecast")
errors = np.vstack([means - lower, upper - means])
axes[1].errorbar(names, means, yerr=errors, fmt="o", color=COLORS["blue"], capsize=4)
zero_line(axes[1])
axes[1].set_ylabel("Mean rank IC")
axes[1].set_xlabel("Walk-forward Stage 2 forecaster")
add_message_title(axes[1], "Mean rank IC with its HAC interval")
show_with_alt(
fig,
"Two stacked panels sharing a horizontal axis of Stage 2 forecaster. The upper is a "
"bar chart of each forecaster's test MSE as a ratio to the zero-return forecast, "
"with a dashed line at one. The lower plots each forecaster's mean rank IC as a "
"point with a HAC interval, against a dashed line at zero.",
)
# %% [markdown]
# ## 7. Factor-count sensitivity
#
# This is a sensitivity analysis, not hyperparameter selection. Every value of
# $K$ is fit on the same training panel and evaluated with the expanding-mean
# forecaster. The evaluation window never chooses the reported factor count.
# %%
def evaluate_factor_count(n_factors: int) -> dict[str, float]:
"""Fit one K and evaluate its expanding-mean forecast."""
candidate = fit_ipca(
train_returns,
train_characteristics,
n_factors=n_factors,
max_iter=MAX_ITER,
)
embargo_history = estimate_factor_history(
embargo_returns, embargo_characteristics, candidate["gamma"]
)
initial_history = np.vstack([candidate["factors"], embargo_history])
realized = estimate_factor_history(test_returns, test_characteristics, candidate["gamma"])
forecasts = walk_forward_factor_forecasts(initial_history, realized)["Expanding mean"]
predictions = map_asset_forecasts(test_characteristics, candidate["gamma"], forecasts)
result = evaluate_asset_forecast(
f"K={n_factors}", predictions, test_returns, SEED + 100 + n_factors
)
return {
"k": float(n_factors),
"train_mse": float(candidate["mse"]),
"mse_ratio": float(result["mse_ratio"]),
"mean_ic": float(result["mean_ic"]),
"ci_low": float(result["ci_low"]),
"ci_high": float(result["ci_high"]),
}
# %%
k_results = [evaluate_factor_count(n_factors) for n_factors in range(1, 7)]
for result in k_results:
print(
f"K={int(result['k'])}: train MSE={result['train_mse']:.6f}, "
f"evaluation MSE ratio={result['mse_ratio']:.4f}, "
f"IC={result['mean_ic']:.4f} "
f"[{result['ci_low']:.4f}, {result['ci_high']:.4f}]"
)
# %%
k_values = np.array([result["k"] for result in k_results], dtype=int)
train_mse = np.array([result["train_mse"] for result in k_results])
k_ratios = np.array([result["mse_ratio"] for result in k_results])
k_ic = np.array([result["mean_ic"] for result in k_results])
k_low = np.array([result["ci_low"] for result in k_results])
k_high = np.array([result["ci_high"] for result in k_results])
fig, axes = plt.subplots(3, 1, figsize=FIGSIZE["grid_3x2"], sharex=True, constrained_layout=True)
axes[0].plot(k_values, train_mse, marker="o", color=COLORS["blue"])
axes[0].set_ylabel("Training MSE")
add_message_title(axes[0], "Training MSE against assumed factor count")
axes[1].plot(k_values, k_ratios, marker="o", color=COLORS["amber"])
zero_line(axes[1], at=1.0)
axes[1].set_ylabel("MSE ratio vs zero")
add_message_title(axes[1], "Test MSE relative to zero, against assumed factor count")
axes[2].errorbar(
k_values,
k_ic,
yerr=np.vstack([k_ic - k_low, k_high - k_ic]),
fmt="o-",
color=COLORS["copper"],
capsize=3,
)
zero_line(axes[2])
axes[2].set_ylabel("Mean rank IC")
axes[2].set_xlabel("Assumed factor count K")
add_message_title(axes[2], "Mean rank IC with its HAC interval, by factor count")
show_with_alt(
fig,
"Three stacked panels sharing a horizontal axis of assumed factor count. The top "
"plots training MSE, the middle test MSE as a ratio to the zero-return forecast "
"against a dashed line at one, and the bottom mean rank IC as points with HAC "
"intervals against a dashed line at zero.",
)
# %% [markdown]
# ## 8. Takeaways
#
# 1. **Timing defines the model.** Characteristics at $t$ are paired with the
# return and factor realization at $t+1$; shifting a contemporaneously
# generated return would test a different data-generating process.
# 2. **The loading subspace is identified, not its labels.** Principal angles
# and projection distance remain valid under rotations and sign changes.
# 3. **Walk-forward means forecast, then reveal.** Each evaluation factor is
# appended only after its prediction, while the one-period embargo protects
# the structural fit at the boundary.
# 4. **Good reconstruction is not factor timing.** ALS recovers the synthetic
# structure, but all Stage 2 forecasters remain indistinguishable from the
# zero-return baseline when factor premia are independent.
# 5. **Sensitivity is not selection.** The $K$ sweep documents how the result
# changes across plausible dimensions; it does not tune on the evaluation
# window.
```Reproduit dans son intégralité avec attribution, conformément à la licence de la source. Licence: MIT
Ce résumé a été rédigé par l’agent de recherche de Stratmill à partir de la source originale ; il n’en est pas une copie.