新闻预期如何产生肥尾与波动聚集
文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Sabiou Inoua
总结
本文解释了金融收益中的两种常见模式:极端变动比简单正态模型预测的更频繁,高波动时期往往会持续。文章提出一种基于两类市场参与者的解释。长期投资者通过新闻驱动的随机游走更新资产估值,从而保留基本面新闻影响的累积效应。短期投机者通过新闻驱动的自回归过程形成预期收益,以反映较短的记忆,以及与趋势跟踪或羊群行为相关的反馈。
本文认为,这些简单的线性预期过程可以广泛且稳健地产生肥尾收益和波动聚集。作者将该框架作为一种替代解释,不依赖参与者之间复杂的相互作用,也不假设理性预期。所提供的文本介绍了这一机制,但没有给出数据、参数估计或与竞争模型的比较测试。因此,这些主张概述的是一种理论解释;摘录无法证明该解释对特定资产、市场或时间尺度的拟合程度。
核心观点
- 长期投资者的估值被建模为由新闻驱动的随机游走。
- 短期投机者的收益预期被建模为由新闻驱动的自回归过程。
- 投机者过程反映了与趋势跟踪或羊群行为相关的短期记忆和反馈。
- 本文认为,这些预期动态能够产生肥尾和波动聚集。
- 摘录介绍了一种理论机制,但未提供实证测试或参数估计。
标签
全文
# News-driven Expectations and Volatility Clustering # News-driven Expectations and Volatility Clustering Financial volatility obeys two fascinating empirical regularities that apply to various assets, on various markets, and on various time scales: it is fat-tailed (more precisely power-law distributed) and it tends to be clustered in time. Many interesting models have been proposed to account for these regularities, notably agent-based models, which mimic the two empirical laws through a complex mix of nonlinear mechanisms such as traders' switching between trading strategies in highly nonlinear way. This paper explains the two regularities simply in terms of traders' attitudes towards news, an explanation that follows almost by definition of the traditional dichotomy of financial market participants, investors versus speculators, whose behaviors are reduced to their simplest forms. Long-run investors' valuations of an asset are assumed to follow a news-driven random walk, thus capturing the investors' persistent, long memory of fundamental news. Short-term speculators' anticipated returns, on the other hand, are assumed to follow a news-driven autoregressive process, capturing their shorter memory of fundamental news, and, by the same token, the feedback intrinsic to the short-sighted, trend-following (or herding) mindset of speculators. These simple, linear, models of traders' expectations, it is shown, explain the two financial regularities in a generic and robust way. Rational expectations, the dominant model of traders' expectations, is not assumed here, owing to the famous no-speculation, no-trade results
在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0
此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。