配偶保障型互助年金领取阶段的神经网络优化
文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Duy-Minh Dang et al.
总结
本文设计一种为家庭退休收入提供配偶保障的互助年金。首次死亡会改变家庭状态,但不会触发资金池转移;账户继续留在该合同中,若退休者先去世,可用于仅由配偶继续领取。作者推导了精算公平条件和一项死亡率抵免分配规则,该规则在结果实现后能够精确平衡。对于代表性家庭,作者制定提款和再平衡决策,以最大化预期累计实际支付,同时考虑终值相对于储备目标的短缺条件风险价值,而不要求存活至规划期末。
研究通过覆盖完整时间范围的神经网络策略参数化求得数值解。基于澳大利亚数据校准的实验发现,配偶继续领取是一种重大且持续的家庭事件。在大规模合同组合的极限下,分散化消除了代表性合同中大部分超额上尾继续领取成本,同时每份合同的预期成本不变。跨国死亡率比较表明,这种模式并非澳大利亚独有。这些是模型数值结果;现有文本没有提供校准细节,也未证明实际联合养老年金产品会产生相同结果。
核心观点
- 首次死亡后,账户继续留在该合同中,并可支持仅由配偶继续领取的阶段。
- 提出的死亡率抵免分配规则可在事后实现精确的预算平衡。
- 家庭提款和再平衡以预期支付及终值储备短缺的 CVaR 为目标进行优化。
- 神经网络为整个时间范围内的可行控制策略设定参数。
- 报告的大规模合同组合极限下,分散化降低了大部分超额上尾继续领取成本,同时不改变每份合同的预期成本。
标签
全文
# Spouse-Protected Tontines: Household Decumulation via Neural-Network Optimization # Spouse-Protected Tontines: Household Decumulation via Neural-Network Optimization We develop a spouse-protected tontine in which a first death changes the household state but generates no pool transfer. The same account remains attached to the household contract until extinction and funds a spouse-only continuation phase if the retiree dies first. We derive contract-level actuarial-fairness conditions and a finite-pool mortality-credit allocation rule with exact ex post budget balance. Under a homogeneous large-pool approximation, we formulate a multidimensional decumulation problem for a representative household, with withdrawal and rebalancing controls while the retiree is alive. The objective balances expected cumulative real household payments against the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of terminal shortfalls relative to household reserve targets, without conditioning on survival to the horizon. We develop a numerical solution method for this problem based on a global-in-time neural-network parameterization of admissible control policies. We quantify policy-induced spouse-continuation costs using expected-cost and risk-loaded payment-scale loads at both representative-contract and book levels. We characterize the large-book limit of average per-contract continuation cost as the expected representative-contract cost conditional on common market information. Numerical experiments calibrated to Australia show that the spouse-only phase is a first-order and persistent household event. In these experiments, book-level diversification removes most of the representative-contract excess upper-tail cost of spouse continuation in the large-book limit, without changing expected per-contract continuation cost. A cross-country mortality comparison indicates that the prevalence and persistence of the spouse-only phase are not specific to Australia.
在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0
此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。