Passer au contenu
Tous les documents de la bibliothèque

DML causale pour estimer l’effet de la prime de risque de variance sur les rendements des options

Code Machine Learning for Trading

Résumé

Ce notebook définit et exécute une analyse par double apprentissage automatique de l’effet de la prime de risque de variance sur les rendements des options sur le S&P 500 jusqu’à l’échéance. Avant l’exécution, il expose l’estimand, le calendrier observé, les facteurs de confusion, la validation croisée temporelle, le modèle de nuisance, la conception de la covariance HAC et la méthode de réfutation par placebo. En mode aperçu, la requête résolue n’est exécutée qu’après définition des réductions d’aperçu ; le notebook vérifie ensuite que le résultat est complet et correspond à l’identité prévue.

Le notebook documente également une modification de la comparaison par placebo : il compare désormais les statistiques t HAC plutôt que les estimations brutes de l’effet, car la permutation par blocs peut modifier la variance résiduelle du traitement et rendre les effets placebo artificiellement étroits. Il cite un résultat antérieur comme motivation, mais son rôle déclaré est de valider et publier le calcul, et non d’interpréter la nouvelle estimation causale. Les conclusions causales nécessitent donc une étape d’analyse distincte et restent tributaires des contrôles spécifiés, des hypothèses de calendrier et du dispositif de réfutation.

Idées clés

  • L’analyse estime l’effet causal de la prime de risque de variance sur les rendements des options jusqu’à leur échéance.
  • Avant l’exécution, le notebook expose l’estimand, le calendrier, les facteurs de confusion, les plis, la méthode de covariance et le dispositif placebo.
  • Comparer les statistiques t HAC lors de la réfutation par placebo tient compte des différences de variance dues à la permutation du traitement.
  • Avant publication, un résultat doit être complet et correspondre à l’identité de la requête résolue.
  • Ce notebook d’exécution transmet les estimations pour une interprétation distincte et ne revendique pas lui-même de nouvelle conclusion empirique.

Étiquettes

Texte intégral
# 10_causal_dml.py


```py
# ---
# jupyter:
#   jupytext:
#     cell_metadata_filter: tags,-all
#     text_representation:
#       extension: .py
#       format_name: percent
#       format_version: '1.3'
#       jupytext_version: 1.19.3
#   kernelspec:
#     display_name: Python 3 (ipykernel)
#     language: python
#     name: python3
# ---

# %% [markdown]
# # S&P 500 Options: Causal DML Execution
#
# This notebook estimates the effect of the variance-risk-premium treatment on the
# return-to-expiry outcome. It declares the request through the shared causal boundary and exposes
# the resolved estimand, timing, confounders, nuisance model, covariance design, and refutation
# protocol before execution.
#
# `11_model_analysis` interprets the causal estimates. This notebook validates the computation
# and publishes its artifact only.
#
# Prerequisites: `03_financial_features`, `04_model_based_features`, and `05_evaluation`.

# %%
"""Execute the declared S&P 500 options causal DML request."""

import polars as pl

from case_studies.research import causal_supersedes
from case_studies.sp500_options.research_workflow import open_study

# %% tags=["parameters"]
EXECUTION_TIER = "canonical"
WORKSPACE: str = ""
PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS: dict = {}
# Retired by this run: the block-permutation refutation now compares the HAC t-statistic
# rather than the raw effect, so CAUSAL_RUNNER_VERSION moved and every causal identity with
# it. The rows named here hold a p-value computed on the shrunken placebo effects; this run
# supersedes them rather than correcting them, because the statistic is different, not the
# arithmetic. Read out of each registry's current canonical identity per label, 2026-09-10.
SUPERSEDES_CAUSAL: str = "d034b82943c5"

# %% [markdown]
# ## Declared and resolved request
#
# A preview must declare all sample, symbol, fold, or placebo reductions. Canonical execution uses
# the complete pre-holdout analysis population.
#
# ### What `SUPERSEDES_CAUSAL` retires here
#
# `CausalResult.one` resolves a label to exactly one canonical identity, so a refit has to name the
# identity it replaces or the registry is left with two and refuses. The retired identity is
# `d034b82943c5`.
#
# What changed is the refutation statistic, not the fit. The placebo loop used to compare each
# permuted run's *effect estimate* against the observed effect. Block-permuting the treatment frees
# it from the controls, so the first stage can no longer predict it and its residual keeps nearly
# all its variance. That residual variance is the whole denominator of the second-stage effect, so
# every placebo effect is divided by a larger number than the observed one and the placebo
# distribution comes out narrower than the null it stands for. The bias runs one way, toward a
# refutation that reads as passed. The comparison is now on the HAC t-statistic, which carries the
# denominator in it and cancels the inflation.
#
# The retired identity fitted the same 166,105 observations and reported the same effect of 0.4098
# with a HAC standard error of 0.3509, so p = 0.243 under either statistic. Its refutation p was
# 0.0099, the smallest value 100 draws can report, for an effect whose own t-statistic is 1.17.
# Sitting at that floor is the signature. This notebook registers and hands off; the new row is
# read and interpreted in `11_model_analysis`.

# %%
study = open_study(execution_tier=EXECUTION_TIER, workspace=WORKSPACE or None)
request_table = pl.DataFrame(
    {
        "method": ["dml"],
        "label": ["ret_to_expiry"],
        "config_name": ["dml"],
        "execution_tier": [EXECUTION_TIER],
    }
)
request_table

# %%
request = study.causal(
    **request_table.row(0, named=True),
    preview_reductions=PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS,
    supersedes=causal_supersedes(
        study,
        SUPERSEDES_CAUSAL,
        "ret_to_expiry",
        labels=["ret_to_expiry"],
        execution_tier=EXECUTION_TIER,
    ),
)
resolved = request.resolve()
computation = resolved.spec["computation"]
estimand = computation["estimand"]
causal_plan = pl.DataFrame(
    {
        "treatment": [estimand["treatment"]],
        "outcome": [estimand["outcome"]],
        "confounders": [", ".join(estimand["confounders"])],
        "treatment_observed_at": [estimand["treatment_observed_at"]],
        "outcome_horizon": [estimand["outcome_horizon"]],
        "folds": [computation["cv"]["n_folds"]],
        "embargo_periods": [computation["cv"]["embargo_periods"]],
        "nuisance_model": [computation["model"]["class"]],
        "covariance": ["HAC with the outcome horizon"],
        "placebo_method": [computation["refutation"]["method"]],
        "placebo_block": [computation["refutation"]["block_size"]],
        "placebo_block_basis": [computation["refutation"]["block_size_basis"]],
        "analysis_rows": [computation["analysis_population"]["n_rows"]],
        "training_hash": [resolved.identity],
    }
)
causal_plan

# %% [markdown]
# ## Execute and validate
#
# The shared DML runner fails on missing confounders, invalid temporal folds, incomplete nuisance
# fits, or a non-finite HAC standard error. A cached result must match the complete resolved
# identity before it can be reused.

# %%
if EXECUTION_TIER == "preview" and (not WORKSPACE or not PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS):
    raise ValueError("preview execution requires WORKSPACE and PREVIEW_REDUCTIONS")
result = resolved.run()
if not result.complete or result.hash != resolved.identity:
    raise RuntimeError("causal execution did not publish the complete resolved request")

# %% tags=["results"]
artifact = pl.DataFrame(
    {
        "causal_hash": [result.hash],
        "label": [resolved.spec["label"]],
        "execution_tier": [result.execution_tier],
        "complete": [result.complete],
    }
)
artifact

# %% [markdown]
# The registered causal artifact is the handoff to `11_model_analysis`. No estimate or empirical
# conclusion is interpreted here.

```

Reproduit dans son intégralité avec attribution, conformément à la licence de la source. Licence: MIT

Ce résumé a été rédigé par l’agent de recherche de Stratmill à partir de la source originale ; il n’en est pas une copie.