跳至正文
返回文库全部文档

波兰股票统计套利中的深度学习复制组合

文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Marek Adamczyk et al.

总结

本研究将配对交易框架应用于波兰股票:通过风险因子构建复制组合与某项资产进行比较,而非将其与另一项高度相关资产配对。研究使用主成分分析、交易所交易基金或长短期记忆网络构建因子,再用奥恩斯坦—乌伦贝克过程对由此得到的残差建模。对于残差回归速度足够快的投资组合,研究生成交易信号。实施使用波兰指数成分股和当地市场假设,包括无风险利率和交易成本。

报告的评估涵盖2017至2019以及衰退年份2020。在较早时期,所有方法均有盈利,其中PCA的累计收益约为20%,夏普比率最高达2.63。在2020,ETF方法仍有盈利,年收益约为5%,而PCA和LSTM表现不佳。证据仅限于所述时期和市场适配;负面的LSTM结果表明,本研究并未证实其表现。

核心观点

  • 该策略使用风险因子复制资产,而非与另一项相关资产配对。
  • 研究使用PCA、ETF和长短期记忆网络构建复制组合。
  • 研究使用奥恩斯坦—乌伦贝克过程对残差建模,以识别均值回归信号。
  • 该研究根据波兰指数和当地交易假设调整了这一框架。
  • 较早测试期内PCA表现领先,而在2020期间,只有ETF方法仍有盈利。

标签

全文
# Statistical Arbitrage in Polish Equities Market Using Deep Learning Techniques


# Statistical Arbitrage in Polish Equities Market Using Deep Learning Techniques









We study a systematic approach to a popular Statistical Arbitrage technique: Pairs Trading. Instead of relying on two highly correlated assets, we replace the second asset with a replication of the first using risk factor representations. These factors are obtained through Principal Components Analysis (PCA), exchange traded funds (ETFs), and, as our main contribution, Long Short Term Memory networks (LSTMs). Residuals between the main asset and its replication are examined for mean reversion properties, and trading signals are generated for sufficiently fast mean reverting portfolios. Beyond introducing a deep learning based replication method, we adapt the framework of Avellaneda and Lee (2008) to the Polish market. Accordingly, components of WIG20, mWIG40, and selected sector indices replace the original S&P500 universe, and market parameters such as the risk free rate and transaction costs are updated to reflect local conditions. We outline the full strategy pipeline: risk factor construction, residual modeling via the Ornstein Uhlenbeck process, and signal generation. Each replication technique is described together with its practical implementation. Strategy performance is evaluated over two periods: 2017-2019 and the recessive year 2020. All methods yield profits in 2017-2019, with PCA achieving roughly 20 percent cumulative return and an annualized Sharpe ratio of up to 2.63. Despite multiple adaptations, our conclusions remain consistent with those of the original paper. During the COVID-19 recession, only the ETF based approach remains profitable (about 5 percent annual return), while PCA and LSTM methods underperform. LSTM results, although negative, are promising and indicate potential for future optimization.

在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0

此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。