PCA instrumentado para betas condicionales y pronósticos de factores
Resumen
Este documento presenta el PCA instrumentado, en el que las cargas factoriales de los activos se modelan como funciones lineales de características observadas antes del rendimiento. Utiliza mínimos cuadrados alternos para estimar la relación entre características y cargas, así como los factores realizados; después, evalúa la recuperación de cargas mediante diagnósticos de subespacios invariantes a rotaciones. Como las rotaciones y los cambios de signo no alteran los rendimientos ajustados, las etiquetas de cada factor no están identificadas; las comparaciones deben centrarse en el subespacio recuperado.
Un panel sintético empareja características en el momento t con rendimientos en t+1, mediante un segmento de entrenamiento, un embargo de un periodo y un segmento de evaluación posterior. Un adaptador de tres etapas ajusta las cargas y el historial de factores, pronostica factores usando solo la información disponible en cada decisión y asigna esos pronósticos a los activos. El ejemplo también informa de la incertidumbre y la sensibilidad al número de factores supuesto. La salvedad principal es que una reconstrucción precisa no implica acertar el momento de los factores: las primas factoriales sintéticas son independientes, por lo que la etapa de pronóstico debe compararse con una referencia de rendimiento cero. La ventana de evaluación es una demostración didáctica, no una evaluación final intacta ni un conjunto para seleccionar modelos.
Ideas clave
- El PCA instrumentado expresa las cargas factoriales como funciones lineales de características de activos retardadas.
- Los mínimos cuadrados alternos estiman sucesivamente los factores realizados y el mapa de características a cargas.
- Las rotaciones y los cambios de signo permiten identificar el subespacio de cargas aunque no se identifiquen las etiquetas de cada factor.
- Los pronósticos walk-forward deben generarse antes de revelar cada realización del factor evaluado.
- Una buena recuperación estructural no garantiza primas factoriales predecibles ni pronósticos de rendimiento útiles.
Etiquetas
Texto completo
# Instrumented PCA: Conditional Betas and Factor Forecasts
# Instrumented PCA: Conditional Betas and Factor Forecasts
**Docker image**: `ml4t`
**Chapter 14: Latent Factor Models**
Instrumented PCA (IPCA) makes an asset's factor loadings linear functions of
characteristics observed before the return:
$$r^e_{i,t+1}=z_{i,t}^{\top}\Gamma f_{t+1}+\varepsilon_{i,t+1}.$$
This notebook uses a synthetic panel with known $\Gamma$ for two separate
checks. First, it verifies that alternating least squares (ALS) recovers the
loading *subspace*. Second, it passes the estimated factors through the
chapter's three-stage forecasting adapter without assuming that the factors
are predictable.
**Learning objectives**
- implement the two ALS updates for IPCA;
- evaluate recovery with rotation-invariant subspace diagnostics;
- map genuinely walk-forward factor forecasts back to asset returns; and
- report forecast uncertainty and sensitivity to the factor count.
**Evaluation contract**: the synthetic characteristics at $t$ generate only
$r_{t+1}$. The structural model uses 349 training pairs, followed by a
one-period embargo and 150 evaluation pairs. The evaluation window is a
teaching demonstration: it is neither a holdout kept untouched for a final
measurement nor a set used to choose between models.
**Prerequisite**: [`01_pca_equity_sectors`](01_pca_equity_sectors.ipynb)
**Book section**: Section 14.5, "Bridging economics and statistics with advanced models"
**Next**: [`05_rp_pca`](05_rp_pca.ipynb) changes the Stage 1 objective to
emphasize priced variation.
## 1. Setup
```python
"""Recover an IPCA loading subspace and evaluate walk-forward factor forecasts."""
from datetime import datetime
from time import perf_counter
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import polars as pl
from matplotlib.colors import LinearSegmentedColormap
from matplotlib.patches import FancyBboxPatch
from ml4t.diagnostic.metrics import cross_sectional_ic_series
from ml4t.diagnostic.metrics.uncertainty import compute_ic_uncertainty
from scipy.linalg import orthogonal_procrustes
from utils.reproducibility import set_global_seeds
from utils.style import (
COLORS,
FIGSIZE,
add_message_title,
ml4t_diverging,
ml4t_palette,
show_with_alt,
zero_line,
)
```
```python
N_PERIODS = 500
N_ASSETS = 100
N_CHARACTERISTICS = 10
N_TRUE_FACTORS = 3
N_IPCA_FACTORS = 3
TRAIN_BOUNDARY = 350
EMBARGO = 1
MAX_ITER = 100
N_BOOTSTRAP = 2_000
EWMA_HALF_LIFE = 12
SEED = 42
set_global_seeds(SEED)
```
The adapter keeps three responsibilities separate. IPCA estimates the
conditional loadings and realized factor history in Stage 1. Stage 2 uses
only factor realizations available at each decision. Stage 3 combines the
current characteristics with the fixed, train-only loading map.
```python
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=FIGSIZE["single_wide"])
ax.set_xlim(0, 12)
ax.set_ylim(0, 4)
ax.axis("off")
boxes = [
(0.4, "Stage 1", "Fit Γ and realized\nfactor history", COLORS["silver_muted"]),
(4.4, "Stage 2", "Forecast next\nfactor premium", COLORS["amber_light"]),
(8.4, "Stage 3", "Map through\ncurrent betas", COLORS["silver"]),
]
for x_pos, stage, detail, facecolor in boxes:
patch = FancyBboxPatch(
(x_pos, 0.9),
3.2,
1.7,
boxstyle="round,pad=0.08",
facecolor=facecolor,
edgecolor=COLORS["blue"],
linewidth=1.2,
)
ax.add_patch(patch)
ax.text(x_pos + 1.6, 1.95, stage, ha="center", weight="semibold", color=COLORS["blue"])
ax.text(x_pos + 1.6, 1.42, detail, ha="center", fontsize=8.5, color=COLORS["neutral"])
for x_pos in (3.75, 7.75):
ax.annotate(
"",
xy=(x_pos + 0.55, 1.75),
xytext=(x_pos, 1.75),
arrowprops={"arrowstyle": "->", "color": COLORS["amber"], "lw": 1.5},
)
add_message_title(ax, "The three stages of a conditional factor model")
show_with_alt(
fig,
"A schematic of three labelled boxes left to right joined by arrows. Stage 1 fits "
"the loading matrix and the realized factor history; Stage 2 forecasts the next "
"factor premium; Stage 3 maps that forecast back to assets through the current "
"betas. The middle box is highlighted.",
)
```
## 2. Alternating least squares
For fixed $\Gamma$, each date is a small cross-sectional least-squares
problem for $f_{t+1}$. A small ridge term protects the solve when the
conditional beta matrix is nearly singular.
```python
def estimate_factor_history(
returns: np.ndarray,
characteristics: np.ndarray,
gamma: np.ndarray,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Estimate one realized factor vector per return cross-section."""
n_periods = returns.shape[0]
n_factors = gamma.shape[1]
factors = np.empty((n_periods, n_factors))
ridge = 1e-8 * np.eye(n_factors)
for period in range(n_periods):
betas = characteristics[period] @ gamma
factors[period] = np.linalg.solve(
betas.T @ betas + ridge,
betas.T @ returns[period],
)
return factors
```
For fixed factors, stack the characteristic-factor interactions into one
pooled regression. The coefficient vector reshapes directly into $\Gamma$.
```python
def update_gamma(
returns: np.ndarray,
characteristics: np.ndarray,
factors: np.ndarray,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Update the characteristic loading map in one pooled regression."""
n_characteristics = characteristics.shape[2]
n_factors = factors.shape[1]
gram = np.zeros((n_characteristics * n_factors,) * 2)
score = np.zeros(n_characteristics * n_factors)
for period, factor in enumerate(factors):
design = np.einsum("nl,k->nlk", characteristics[period], factor).reshape(
returns.shape[1], -1
)
gram += design.T @ design
score += design.T @ returns[period]
ridge = 1e-8 * np.eye(gram.shape[0])
return np.linalg.solve(gram + ridge, score).reshape(n_characteristics, n_factors)
```
IPCA is unchanged by invertible rotations of $\Gamma$ and the factors.
Orthonormalizing the loading map and ordering directions by factor variance
chooses a stable representation without changing fitted returns.
```python
def normalize_ipca(
gamma: np.ndarray,
factors: np.ndarray,
) -> tuple[np.ndarray, np.ndarray]:
"""Choose an orthonormal, variance-ordered representation."""
gamma_orthogonal, transform = np.linalg.qr(gamma)
factor_history = factors @ transform.T
covariance = np.atleast_2d(np.cov(factor_history, rowvar=False))
eigenvalues, rotation = np.linalg.eigh(covariance)
rotation = rotation[:, np.argsort(eigenvalues)[::-1]]
gamma_normalized = gamma_orthogonal @ rotation
factors_normalized = factor_history @ rotation
anchors = np.argmax(np.abs(gamma_normalized), axis=0)
signs = np.sign(gamma_normalized[anchors, np.arange(gamma.shape[1])])
signs[signs == 0] = 1
return gamma_normalized * signs, factors_normalized * signs
```
The initializer applies PCA to characteristic-managed returns. ALS then
alternates the two closed-form updates until both objects stabilize.
```python
def fit_ipca(
returns: np.ndarray,
characteristics: np.ndarray,
n_factors: int,
max_iter: int = 100,
tolerance: float = 1e-6,
) -> dict[str, object]:
"""Fit IPCA by alternating least squares."""
managed = np.einsum("tnl,tn->tl", characteristics, returns) / returns.shape[1]
eigenvalues, eigenvectors = np.linalg.eigh(managed.T @ managed)
gamma = eigenvectors[:, np.argsort(eigenvalues)[-n_factors:]]
previous_factors = np.zeros((returns.shape[0], n_factors))
converged = False
for iteration in range(1, max_iter + 1):
factors = estimate_factor_history(returns, characteristics, gamma)
updated_gamma = update_gamma(returns, characteristics, factors)
gamma_delta = np.max(np.abs(updated_gamma - gamma))
factor_delta = np.max(np.abs(factors - previous_factors))
gamma, previous_factors = updated_gamma, factors
if max(gamma_delta, factor_delta) < tolerance:
converged = True
break
factors = estimate_factor_history(returns, characteristics, gamma)
gamma, factors = normalize_ipca(gamma, factors)
fitted = np.einsum("tnk,tk->tn", characteristics @ gamma, factors)
return {
"gamma": gamma,
"factors": factors,
"converged": converged,
"iterations": iteration,
"mse": float(np.mean((returns - fitted) ** 2)),
}
```
## 3. A timing-correct synthetic panel
Characteristics follow persistent AR(1) processes and are standardized
within each cross-section. The return paired with $z_t$ is generated from
the independent factor shock at $t+1$, exactly matching the model equation.
```python
def generate_ipca_panel(seed: int = SEED) -> dict[str, np.ndarray]:
"""Generate lagged characteristics and their next-period returns."""
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
characteristics = np.empty((N_PERIODS, N_ASSETS, N_CHARACTERISTICS))
characteristics[0] = rng.normal(size=(N_ASSETS, N_CHARACTERISTICS))
for period in range(1, N_PERIODS):
innovation = rng.normal(size=(N_ASSETS, N_CHARACTERISTICS))
characteristics[period] = 0.8 * characteristics[period - 1] + 0.6 * innovation
means = characteristics.mean(axis=1, keepdims=True)
scales = characteristics.std(axis=1, keepdims=True)
characteristics = (characteristics - means) / scales
true_gamma, _ = np.linalg.qr(rng.normal(size=(N_CHARACTERISTICS, N_TRUE_FACTORS)))
factor_scales = np.array([0.040, 0.025, 0.015])
true_factors = rng.normal(size=(N_PERIODS + 1, N_TRUE_FACTORS)) * factor_scales
betas = characteristics @ true_gamma
next_returns = np.einsum("tnk,tk->tn", betas, true_factors[1:])
next_returns += rng.normal(scale=0.010, size=next_returns.shape)
return {
"characteristics": characteristics,
"next_returns": next_returns,
"true_gamma": true_gamma,
"true_factors": true_factors,
}
```
```python
panel = generate_ipca_panel()
train_stop = TRAIN_BOUNDARY - EMBARGO
test_start = TRAIN_BOUNDARY
train_characteristics = panel["characteristics"][:train_stop]
train_returns = panel["next_returns"][:train_stop]
embargo_characteristics = panel["characteristics"][train_stop:test_start]
embargo_returns = panel["next_returns"][train_stop:test_start]
test_characteristics = panel["characteristics"][test_start:]
test_returns = panel["next_returns"][test_start:]
print(
f"Pairs: train={len(train_returns)}, embargo={len(embargo_returns)}, "
f"evaluation={len(test_returns)}"
)
```
## 4. Stage 1: recover the loading subspace
Individual columns of $\Gamma$ are not identified: rotations and sign flips
leave fitted returns unchanged. Principal-angle cosines and the distance
between projection matrices therefore test the estimable object.
```python
started = perf_counter()
ipca = fit_ipca(
train_returns,
train_characteristics,
n_factors=N_IPCA_FACTORS,
max_iter=MAX_ITER,
)
elapsed = perf_counter() - started
print(
f"ALS: converged={ipca['converged']}, iterations={ipca['iterations']}, "
f"train MSE={ipca['mse']:.6f}, elapsed={elapsed:.2f}s"
)
```
```python
true_basis, _ = np.linalg.qr(panel["true_gamma"])
estimated_basis, _ = np.linalg.qr(ipca["gamma"])
principal_cosines = np.linalg.svd(true_basis.T @ estimated_basis, compute_uv=False)
projector_distance = np.linalg.norm(
true_basis @ true_basis.T - estimated_basis @ estimated_basis.T,
ord="fro",
)
alignment, _ = orthogonal_procrustes(estimated_basis, true_basis)
aligned_basis = estimated_basis @ alignment
alignment_rmse = float(np.sqrt(np.mean((true_basis - aligned_basis) ** 2)))
print(
"Subspace: cosines="
f"{np.round(principal_cosines, 4).tolist()}, "
f"projector distance={projector_distance:.4f}, aligned RMSE={alignment_rmse:.4f}"
)
```
Both panels below use the same color scale. Similar vertical patterns after
orthogonal alignment indicate recovery of the loading subspace, not recovery
of arbitrarily labeled columns.
```python
gamma_cmap = LinearSegmentedColormap.from_list("ml4t_diverging", ml4t_diverging())
limit = float(np.max(np.abs(np.concatenate([true_basis, aligned_basis], axis=1))))
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=FIGSIZE["dual_h_tall"], sharey=True)
for ax, basis, label in zip(
axes,
(true_basis, aligned_basis),
("Known basis", "Estimated basis after alignment"),
strict=True,
):
image = ax.imshow(basis, aspect="auto", cmap=gamma_cmap, vmin=-limit, vmax=limit)
ax.set_xlabel(f"{label}\nLatent direction")
ax.set_xticks(range(N_TRUE_FACTORS), [f"F{k + 1}" for k in range(N_TRUE_FACTORS)])
axes[0].set_ylabel("Characteristic index")
fig.colorbar(image, ax=axes, label="Orthonormal loading coefficient", shrink=0.82)
add_message_title(
axes[0],
"Known and estimated loading matrices, side by side",
subtitle="Both shown after aligning the estimate to the known basis",
)
show_with_alt(
fig,
"Two heatmaps side by side on one colour scale, characteristic index on the vertical "
"axis and latent direction on the horizontal. The left is the known loading matrix "
"the data was generated from; the right is the estimate after alignment. A shared "
"colour bar gives the orthonormal loading coefficient.",
)
print(f"Minimum principal-angle cosine between the two subspaces: {principal_cosines.min():.3f}")
```
## 5. Stage 2: one-step factor forecasts
Each forecast is computed before the matching evaluation factor is appended
to history. The embargo-period return is observable at the first evaluation
decision, so it updates the factor history but never enters the Stage 1 fit.
```python
def constant_factor_forecast(history: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""Forecast each factor with its expanding historical mean."""
return history.mean(axis=0)
```
```python
def ar1_factor_forecast(history: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""Fit one AR(1) per factor and forecast from the latest realization."""
forecasts = np.empty(history.shape[1])
design = np.column_stack([np.ones(len(history) - 1), history[:-1]])
for factor in range(history.shape[1]):
coefficients = np.linalg.lstsq(design[:, [0, factor + 1]], history[1:, factor], rcond=None)[
0
]
forecasts[factor] = coefficients[0] + coefficients[1] * history[-1, factor]
return forecasts
```
```python
def ewma_factor_forecast(
history: np.ndarray,
half_life: int = EWMA_HALF_LIFE,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Forecast with an exponentially weighted mean of available factors."""
ages = np.arange(len(history) - 1, -1, -1)
weights = np.exp(-np.log(2) * ages / half_life)
weights /= weights.sum()
return weights @ history
```
```python
def walk_forward_factor_forecasts(
initial_history: np.ndarray,
realized_factors: np.ndarray,
) -> dict[str, np.ndarray]:
"""Forecast first, then reveal and append each realized factor vector."""
forecasters = {
"Expanding mean": constant_factor_forecast,
"AR(1)": ar1_factor_forecast,
"EWMA": ewma_factor_forecast,
}
predictions = {name: np.empty_like(realized_factors) for name in forecasters}
history = initial_history.copy()
for step, realized in enumerate(realized_factors):
for name, forecaster in forecasters.items():
predictions[name][step] = forecaster(history)
history = np.vstack([history, realized])
return predictions
```
```python
embargo_factors = estimate_factor_history(
embargo_returns,
embargo_characteristics,
ipca["gamma"],
)
initial_factor_history = np.vstack([ipca["factors"], embargo_factors])
realized_test_factors = estimate_factor_history(
test_returns,
test_characteristics,
ipca["gamma"],
)
factor_forecasts = walk_forward_factor_forecasts(
initial_factor_history,
realized_test_factors,
)
```
## 6. Stage 3: asset forecasts and uncertainty
The mapper uses only current characteristics and the train-only $\Gamma$.
Forecast $R^2$ uses the economically neutral zero-return forecast as its
denominator. Cross-sectional IC uncertainty uses a Newey-West standard error;
the displayed interval is not an independence-based shortcut.
```python
def map_asset_forecasts(
characteristics: np.ndarray,
gamma: np.ndarray,
factor_forecasts: np.ndarray,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""Map factor forecasts through current conditional betas."""
return np.einsum("tnk,tk->tn", characteristics @ gamma, factor_forecasts)
```
```python
def as_long_panel(values: np.ndarray, value_name: str) -> pl.DataFrame:
"""Convert a period-by-asset matrix to the canonical long schema."""
timestamps = pl.datetime_range(
datetime(2000, 1, 1),
datetime(2000, 1, 1) + pl.duration(days=values.shape[0] - 1),
interval="1d",
eager=True,
)
return pl.DataFrame(
{
"timestamp": np.repeat(timestamps.to_numpy(), values.shape[1]),
"symbol": np.tile([f"A{i:03d}" for i in range(values.shape[1])], values.shape[0]),
value_name: values.ravel(),
}
)
```
```python
def evaluate_asset_forecast(
name: str,
predictions: np.ndarray,
realized_returns: np.ndarray,
seed: int,
) -> dict[str, float | str]:
"""Compute zero-benchmark error and HAC IC uncertainty."""
pred_frame = as_long_panel(predictions, "prediction")
return_frame = as_long_panel(realized_returns, "forward_return")
ic_frame = cross_sectional_ic_series(
pred_frame,
return_frame,
date_col="timestamp",
entity_col="symbol",
)
uncertainty = compute_ic_uncertainty(
ic_frame,
horizon=1,
n_boot=N_BOOTSTRAP,
seed=seed,
)
mse = float(np.mean((realized_returns - predictions) ** 2))
zero_mse = float(np.mean(realized_returns**2))
return {
"name": name,
"mse_ratio": mse / zero_mse,
"r2_zero": 1 - mse / zero_mse,
"mean_ic": uncertainty["mean_ic"],
"ci_low": uncertainty["ci_hac_lower"],
"ci_high": uncertainty["ci_hac_upper"],
"p_hac": uncertainty["p_hac"],
}
```
```python
forecast_results = []
for index, (name, forecast) in enumerate(factor_forecasts.items()):
asset_predictions = map_asset_forecasts(
test_characteristics,
ipca["gamma"],
forecast,
)
result = evaluate_asset_forecast(name, asset_predictions, test_returns, SEED + index)
forecast_results.append(result)
print(
f"{name}: MSE ratio={result['mse_ratio']:.4f}, "
f"IC={result['mean_ic']:.4f} "
f"[{result['ci_low']:.4f}, {result['ci_high']:.4f}], "
f"HAC p={result['p_hac']:.3f}"
)
```
The zero-return benchmark is deliberately hard to beat when latent premia
are independent draws with mean zero. The IC intervals show whether any
apparent cross-sectional ordering is larger than the time-series uncertainty
around it.
```python
names = [result["name"] for result in forecast_results]
ratios = np.array([result["mse_ratio"] for result in forecast_results])
means = np.array([result["mean_ic"] for result in forecast_results])
lower = np.array([result["ci_low"] for result in forecast_results])
upper = np.array([result["ci_high"] for result in forecast_results])
colors = ml4t_palette(len(names), categorical=True)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=FIGSIZE["dual_v"], sharex=True, constrained_layout=True)
axes[0].bar(names, ratios, color=colors)
zero_line(axes[0], at=1.0)
axes[0].set_ylabel("MSE ratio vs zero")
add_message_title(axes[0], "Test MSE relative to the zero-return forecast")
errors = np.vstack([means - lower, upper - means])
axes[1].errorbar(names, means, yerr=errors, fmt="o", color=COLORS["blue"], capsize=4)
zero_line(axes[1])
axes[1].set_ylabel("Mean rank IC")
axes[1].set_xlabel("Walk-forward Stage 2 forecaster")
add_message_title(axes[1], "Mean rank IC with its HAC interval")
show_with_alt(
fig,
"Two stacked panels sharing a horizontal axis of Stage 2 forecaster. The upper is a "
"bar chart of each forecaster's test MSE as a ratio to the zero-return forecast, "
"with a dashed line at one. The lower plots each forecaster's mean rank IC as a "
"point with a HAC interval, against a dashed line at zero.",
)
```
## 7. Factor-count sensitivity
This is a sensitivity analysis, not hyperparameter selection. Every value of
$K$ is fit on the same training panel and evaluated with the expanding-mean
forecaster. The evaluation window never chooses the reported factor count.
```python
def evaluate_factor_count(n_factors: int) -> dict[str, float]:
"""Fit one K and evaluate its expanding-mean forecast."""
candidate = fit_ipca(
train_returns,
train_characteristics,
n_factors=n_factors,
max_iter=MAX_ITER,
)
embargo_history = estimate_factor_history(
embargo_returns, embargo_characteristics, candidate["gamma"]
)
initial_history = np.vstack([candidate["factors"], embargo_history])
realized = estimate_factor_history(test_returns, test_characteristics, candidate["gamma"])
forecasts = walk_forward_factor_forecasts(initial_history, realized)["Expanding mean"]
predictions = map_asset_forecasts(test_characteristics, candidate["gamma"], forecasts)
result = evaluate_asset_forecast(
f"K={n_factors}", predictions, test_returns, SEED + 100 + n_factors
)
return {
"k": float(n_factors),
"train_mse": float(candidate["mse"]),
"mse_ratio": float(result["mse_ratio"]),
"mean_ic": float(result["mean_ic"]),
"ci_low": float(result["ci_low"]),
"ci_high": float(result["ci_high"]),
}
```
```python
k_results = [evaluate_factor_count(n_factors) for n_factors in range(1, 7)]
for result in k_results:
print(
f"K={int(result['k'])}: train MSE={result['train_mse']:.6f}, "
f"evaluation MSE ratio={result['mse_ratio']:.4f}, "
f"IC={result['mean_ic']:.4f} "
f"[{result['ci_low']:.4f}, {result['ci_high']:.4f}]"
)
```
```python
k_values = np.array([result["k"] for result in k_results], dtype=int)
train_mse = np.array([result["train_mse"] for result in k_results])
k_ratios = np.array([result["mse_ratio"] for result in k_results])
k_ic = np.array([result["mean_ic"] for result in k_results])
k_low = np.array([result["ci_low"] for result in k_results])
k_high = np.array([result["ci_high"] for result in k_results])
fig, axes = plt.subplots(3, 1, figsize=FIGSIZE["grid_3x2"], sharex=True, constrained_layout=True)
axes[0].plot(k_values, train_mse, marker="o", color=COLORS["blue"])
axes[0].set_ylabel("Training MSE")
add_message_title(axes[0], "Training MSE against assumed factor count")
axes[1].plot(k_values, k_ratios, marker="o", color=COLORS["amber"])
zero_line(axes[1], at=1.0)
axes[1].set_ylabel("MSE ratio vs zero")
add_message_title(axes[1], "Test MSE relative to zero, against assumed factor count")
axes[2].errorbar(
k_values,
k_ic,
yerr=np.vstack([k_ic - k_low, k_high - k_ic]),
fmt="o-",
color=COLORS["copper"],
capsize=3,
)
zero_line(axes[2])
axes[2].set_ylabel("Mean rank IC")
axes[2].set_xlabel("Assumed factor count K")
add_message_title(axes[2], "Mean rank IC with its HAC interval, by factor count")
show_with_alt(
fig,
"Three stacked panels sharing a horizontal axis of assumed factor count. The top "
"plots training MSE, the middle test MSE as a ratio to the zero-return forecast "
"against a dashed line at one, and the bottom mean rank IC as points with HAC "
"intervals against a dashed line at zero.",
)
```
## 8. Takeaways
1. **Timing defines the model.** Characteristics at $t$ are paired with the
return and factor realization at $t+1$; shifting a contemporaneously
generated return would test a different data-generating process.
2. **The loading subspace is identified, not its labels.** Principal angles
and projection distance remain valid under rotations and sign changes.
3. **Walk-forward means forecast, then reveal.** Each evaluation factor is
appended only after its prediction, while the one-period embargo protects
the structural fit at the boundary.
4. **Good reconstruction is not factor timing.** ALS recovers the synthetic
structure, but all Stage 2 forecasters remain indistinguishable from the
zero-return baseline when factor premia are independent.
5. **Sensitivity is not selection.** The $K$ sweep documents how the result
changes across plausible dimensions; it does not tune on the evaluation
window.



Se muestra íntegramente con atribución según la licencia de la fuente. Licencia: MIT
Este resumen lo redactó el agente de investigación de Stratmill a partir del original; no es una copia de la fuente.